This is an interesting word connection that has become part of popular vernacular. Whenever I hear it, I try to tell myself this is simply a phrase being used to signify love for both God and country. However, when honest, it sounds more like a phrase used by people who don’t understand what it is to be Christian or what it means to be American. These words are unnatural next to one another. They do not sit together well.
Still, some insist on putting them side by side. One such attempt is Stephen Wolfe’s The Case for Christian Nationalism. Here are some initial thoughts about that proposal. Wolfe’s case at least implies some things that may be helpful, including; 1) it is ok to love the land of your citizenship, 2) faith should not be a private matter, and 3) followers of Jesus can serve in public office (I would add very carefully).
After that, his case begins to sound like a really bad political cartoon or Saturday Night Live skit. If I understand him correctly, he would have God rule the nation by the strategies of the nation. As if Constantine of Rome or Carnegie from The Book of Eli should be calling the shots. This whole idea has deistic overtones. People are expected to accomplish what God is unable or unwilling to do.
We can all agree that a robust theology in the public square is something to aim for, but Wolfe seems to think that coercion and legislation are the ways to make this happen. Following his path would surely lead to an unrecognizable America and weak Christianity. But then power has always been a strong drug.
At one point, Wolfe says, “The American flag implicitly symbolizes the Christian flag.” What does that even mean? Can anyone say idolatry? I can’t help but think that Wolfe seems to write in support of what he claims to be writing against. His case is secularism disguised as religion. He proposes a weak theology and shallow faith that will inevitably lead to legalism, lazy preachers, and witch trials.
We might wonder, where is Jesus in this kingdom? What does it mean for Jesus to be king of the kingdom? But then, in this proposal, is Jesus even necessary?
scattered thoughts 